Previous Page

References

  1. Reuter B. Schenck U. Investigation of the visual cytoscreening of conventional gynaecologic smears. II. Analysis of eye movement. Analytical & Quantitative Cytology & Histology. 8(3):210-8, 1986 (Reprinted in: Weid G. et al, Compendium on Quality Assurance, Proficiency Testing and Workload Limitations in Clinical Cytology. Tutorials of Cytology Chicago Il 1995)
  2. Schenck U. Reuter B. Vohringer P. Investigation of the visual cytoscreening of conventional gynaecologic smears. I. Analysis of slide movement. Analytical & Quantitative Cytology & Histology. 8(1):35-45, 1986 (Reprinted in: Weid G. et al, Compendium on Quality Assurance, Proficiency Testing and Workload Limitations in Clinical Cytology. Tutorials of Cytology Chicago Il 1995)
  3. Raab SS. Geisinger KR. Silverman JF. Thomas PA. Stanley MW. Interobserver variability of a Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 110(5):653 9, 1998
  4. O'Sullivan JP. Observer variation in gynaecological cytopathology. (Invited Review) Cytopathology. 9(1):6-14, 1998
  5. Mravunac M. Smedts F. Philippi A. Remerij D. Krul A. Schrik M. van't Hof B. van Heusden C. Vooijs GP. Interpreting microbiopsies in cervical smears. A cytohistologic approach. Acta Cytologica. 44(5):752-9, 2000
  6. Klinkhamer PJ. Vooijs GP. de Haan AF. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities in cervical smears. Acta Cytologica. 32(6):794-800, 1988
  7. McCrone, J. Going Inside: A tour round a single moment of consciousness. Faber and Faber London 1999
  8. Bosch MM. Rietveld-Scheffers PE. Boon ME. Characteristics of false-negative smears tested in the normal screening situation. Acta Cytologica. 36(5):711-6, 1992
  9. Wilbur DC. False negatives in focused rescreening of Papanicolaou smears: how frequently are 'abnormal' cells detected in retrospective review of smears preceding cancer or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia? Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 121(3):273-6, 1997
  10. Vooijs G.P., van Aspert van Erp A.J.M., van 't Hof Grootenboer B.E. and Klinkhamer P.J.J.M. Intra- and Interobserver Variability. (In Weid G. et al (Eds), Compendium on Quality Assurance, Proficiency Testing and Workload Limitations in Clinical Cytology. Tutorials of Cytology Chicago Il 15-27, 1995)
  11. Smith PA. Turnbull LS. Small cell and 'pale' dyskaryosis. (Invited Review) Cytopathology. 8(1):3-8, 1997
  12. Lee KR. Adenocarcinoma in situ with a small cell (endometrioid) pattern in cervical smears: a test of the distinction from benign mimics using specific criteria. Cancer. 87(5):254-8, 1999
  13. Raab SS. Isacson C. Layfield LJ. Lenel JC. Slagel DD. Thomas PA. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Cytologic criteria to separate clinically significant from benign lesions. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 104(5):574-82, 1995
  14. Kurman R.J. and Solomon D. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes for Terminology and Specimen Adequacy. Spronger-Verlag, New York, 1994
  15. Lyall H. Duncan ID. Inaccuracy of cytologic diagnosis in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN 3). Acta Cytologica. 39(1):50-4, 1995
  16. McGrath CM. Kurtis JD. Yu GH. Evaluation of mild-to-moderate dysplasia on cervical-endocervical (Pap) smear: a subgroup of patients who bridge LSIL and HSIL. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 23(4):245-8, 2000
  17. DiTomasso JP. Ramzy I. Mody DR. Glandular lesions of the cervix. Validity of cytologic criteria used to differentiate reactive changes, glandular intraepithelial lesions and adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytologica. 40(6):1127-35, 1996
  18. Pacey, N.F. Glandular Neoplasms of the Uterine Cervix. In Bibbo, M. (Ed) Comprehensive Cytopathology. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. p231-256, 1991
  19. Mitchell H. Medley G. Differences between Papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses. Cytopathology. 6(6):368-75, 1995
  20. Bowditch R. Patterns Found in False Negative Cervical Cytology. Cytoletter 20:3 p22-25, 1996
  21. Howell S. Theodor M. Pacey NF. Patwardhan JR. Ayer B. Quality assurance in cytology. Rescreening of previously negative smears from high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Acta Cytologica. 41(4):1085-90, 1997
  22. O'Sullivan JP. Chapman PA. Jenkins L. Smith R. Characteristics of high grade dyskaryotic cervical smears likely to be missed on rapid rescreening. Acta Cytologica. 44(1):37-40, 2000
  23. Egan AJ. Russell P. Transitional (urothelial) cell metaplasia of the uterine cervix: morphological assessment of 31 cases. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 16(2):89-98, 1997
  24. Weir MM. Bell DA. Transitional cell metaplasia of the cervix: a newly described entity in cervicovaginal smears. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 18(3):222-6, 1998
  25. Weir M.M., Bell D.A. and Young R.H. Transitional cell metaplasia of the uterine cervix and vagina: an under recognized lesion that may be confused with high grade dysplasia. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 21(5):510-517, 1998
  26. Park JJ. Sun D. Quade BJ. Flynn C. Sheets EE. Yang A. McKeon F. Crum CP. Stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: adenosquamous or columnar cell neoplasia? American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 24(10):
    1414-9, 2000
  27. Solomon D. Davey D. Kurman R. Moriarty A. O'Connor D. Prey M. Raab S. Sherman M. Wilbur D. Wright T Jr. Young N. The Forum Group Members. The Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 287(16):2114-9, 2002
  28. Tritz DM. Weeks JA. Spires SE. Sattich M. Banks H. Cibull ML. Davey DD. Etiologies for non-correlating cervical cytologies and biopsies. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 103(5):594-7, 1995
  29. Clary K.M., Mahood L.K. and Raab S.S. (Abst) Evaluation of High Grade Discrepancies in Cervicovaginal Cytology and Histology. Acta Cytologica. 45:836, 2001
  30. Anderson MB. Jones BA. False positive cervicovaginal cytology. A follow-up study. Acta Cytologica. 41(6):1697-700, 1997
  31. Auger M. Charbonneau M. Arseneau J. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases. Acta Cytologica. 41(6):1671-5, 1997
  32. Krane JF. Granter SR. Trask CE. Hogan CL. Lee KR. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases. Cancer. 93(1):8-15, 2001
  33. Frost J.K. Pathologic processes Affecting Cells from Inflammation to Cancer. In Bibbo, M. (Ed) Comprehensive Cytopathology. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. 231-256, 1991
  34. Kurtycz D. Nunez M. Arts T. Bauman C. Harris C. Inhorn S. Meisner L. Use of fluorescent in situ hybridization to detect aneuploidy in cervical dysplasia. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 15(1):46-51, 1996
  35. Bollmann R. Bollmann M. Henson DE. Bodo M. DNA cytometry confirms the utility of the Bethesda system for the classification of Papanicolaou smears. Cancer. 93(3):222-8, 2001
  36. Boon M.E. and Suurmeijer A.J.H. The Pap Smear. Coulomb Press Leyden. 1991
  37. Schoolland M. Sterrett GF. Knowles SA. Mitchell KM. Kurinczuk JJ. The "Inconclusive-possible high grade epithelial abnormality" category in Papanicolaou smear reporting. Cancer. 84(4):208-17, 1998
  38. DeMay R.M. The Art & Science of Cytopathology. ASCP Press, Chicago Il. 1996
  39. DeMay RM. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 121(3):229-38, 1997
  40. Lee KR. Manna EA. St John T. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 13(3):202-8, 1995
  41. Selvaggi, S. Cytological Features of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ Involving Endocervical Glands in Endocervical Cytobrush Specimens. Acta Cytologica. 38(5):687-692, 1994
  42. Reagan J.W. and Patten S.F. Analytic Study of Cellular Changes in Carcinoma In Situ, Squamous Cell Cancer, and Adenocarcinoma of Uterine Cervix. Clinical Obstetric Gynaecology. 4:1097-1127, 1961
  43. Nam, J-H., Kim, J-H, Huh, J., Koh, C-W., Na, J-H., Kim, B-H., Kim, Y-M., Kim,Y-T. and Mok, J-E. Correlation of lesion grade in cervical neoplasia with cell proliferation and apoptosis. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 8: 279-286, 1998
  44. Sarkiss M., Hsu B., El-Naggar A.K. and McDonnell T.J. The Clinical Relevance and Assessment of Apoptotic Cell Death. (Review Article). Advances in Anatomic Pathology. 3: 205-211, 1996
  45. Bose S. Kannan V. Kline TS. Abnormal endocervical cells. Really abnormal? Really endocervical? American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 101(6):708-13, 1994
  46. Chhieng DC. Elgert PA. Cangiarella JF. Cohen JM. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. A follow-up study from an academic medical center. Acta Cytologica. 44(4):557-66, 2000
  47. Rosenthal DL. McLatchie C. Stern E. White BS. Castleman KR. Endocervical columnar cell atypia coincident with cervical neoplasia characterized by digital image analysis. Acta Cytologica. 26(2):115-20, 1982
  48. Suh KS. Silverberg SG. Tubal metaplasia of the uterine cervix. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 9(2):122-8, 1990
  49. Jonasson JG. Wang HH. Antonioli DA. Ducatman BS. Tubal metaplasia of the uterine cervix: a prevalence study in patients with gynaecologic pathologic findings. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 11(2):89-95, 1992
  50. Babkowski RC. Wilbur DC. Rutkowski MA. Facik MS. Bonfiglio TA. The effects of endocervical canal topography, tubal metaplasia, and high canal sampling on the cytologic presentation of nonneoplastic endocervical cells. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 105(4):403-10, 1996
  51. Novotny DB. Maygarden SJ. Johnson DE. Frable WJ. Tubal metaplasia. A frequent potential pitfall in the cytologic diagnosis of endocervical glandular dysplasia on cervical smears. Acta Cytologica. 36(1):1-10, 1992
  52. Drijkoningen M. Meertens B. Lauweryns J. High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 3) with extension into the endocervical clefts. Difficulty of cytologic differentiation from adenocarcinoma in situ. Acta Cytologica. 40(5):889-94, 1996
  53. Lee KR. Manna EA. Jones MA. Comparative cytologic features of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytologica. 35(1):117-26, 1991
  54. McCluggage WG. Maxwell P. McBride HA. Hamilton PW. Bharucha H. Monoclonal antibodies Ki-67 and MIB1 in the distinction of tuboendometrial metaplasia from endocervical adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma in situ in formalin-fixed material. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 14(3):209-16, 1995
  55. Schlesinger C. Silverberg SG. Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ of tubal type and its relation to atypical tubal metaplasia. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 18(1):1-4, 1999
  56. Coleman D.V. and Evans D.M.D. Biopsy Pathology and Cytology of the Cervix. Chapman and Hall. London 1988
  57. Nunez C. Abdul-Karim FW. Somrak TM. Glassy-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cytopathologic and histopathologic study of five cases. Acta Cytologica. 29(3):303-9, 1985
  58. Saigo PE. Wolinska WH. Kim WS. Hajdu SI. The role of cytology in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytologica. 29(5):785-94, 1985
  59. Sugimori H. Kashimura Y. Kashimura M. Urushima M. Sato A. Takao M. Analytical study of repair cells. Acta Cytologica. 26(4):439-44, 1982
  60. Valente, P.T. and Schantz, D. The Diagnosis of Glandular Abnormalities in Cervical Smears. In Cytopathology 1996. Schmidt, W.A. (Ed) ASCP Reviews in Pathology. ASCP Press, Chicago. Ch2 p39-68, 1996
  61. Chung JH. Koh JS. Lee SS. Cho KJ. Glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cytologic features and expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors. Acta Cytologica. 44(4):551-6, 2000
  62. Bibbo M., Keebler .M. and Wied G.L. Tissue Repair. In Wied G.L., Keebler C.M., Koss L.G and Reagan J.W. Compendium on Diagnostic Cytology 6th Ed. Tutorials of Cytology. Chicago Ill. 1988
  63. Patten S.F Benign Proliferative Reactions of the Uterine Cervix. In Wied G.L., Keebler C.M., Koss L.G and Reagan J.W. Compendium on Diagnostic Cytology 6th Ed. Tutorials of Cytology. Chicago Ill. 1988
  64. Dvoretsky PM. Bonfiglio TA. Patten SF Jr. Helmkamp BF. Pemphigus vulgaris and microinvasive squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytologica. 29(3):403-10, 1985
  65. Abati A. Jaffurs W. Wilder AM. Squamous atypia in the atrophic cervical vaginal smear: a new look at an old problem. Cancer. 84(4):218-25, 1998
  66. Luzzatto R. Poli M. Recktenvald M. Luzzatto L. Human papillomavirus infection in atrophic smears. A case report. Acta Cytologica. 44(3):420-2, 2000
  67. Sie-Go D.M.D.S (Abstract) Interpretation of Endometrial Smears in Cervical Smears. Acta Cytologica. 42(2):570, 1998
  68. Reagan J.W. and Ng A.B.P. The Cells of Endometrial Cancer. In Weid G.L., Keebler K., Koss L.G. and Reagan J.W. (Eds) Compendium on Diagnostic Cytology 6th Ed. Tutorials of Cytology Chicago Ill. 194-202, 1988
  69. Johnson TL. Kini SR. Endometrial metaplasia as a source of atypical glandular cells in cervicovaginal smears. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 14(1):25-31, 1996
  70. Chang A. Sandweiss L. Bose S. Cytologically benign endometrial cells in the papanicolaou smears of postmenopausal women. Gynaecologic Oncology. 80(1):37-43, 2001
  71. Ashfaq R. Sharma S. Dulley T. Saboorian MH. Siddiqui MT. Warner C. Clinical relevance of benign endometrial cells in postmenopausal women. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 25(4):235-8, 2001
  72. Selvaggi SM. Haefner HK. Microglandular endocervical hyperplasia and tubal metaplasia: pitfalls in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on cervical smears. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 16(2):168-73, 1997
  73. Kobayashi TK. Casslen B. Stormby N. Cytologic atypias in the uterine fluid of intrauterine contraceptive device users. Acta Cytologica. 27(2):138-41, 1983
  74. Heaton RB Jr. Harris TF. Larson DM. Henry MR. Glandular cells derived from direct sampling of the lower uterine segment in patients status post-cervical cone biopsy. A diagnostic dilemma. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 106(4):511-6, 1996
  75. Hong SR. Park JS. Kim HS. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in cervical smears after conization. Cytologic features differentiating them from adenocarcinoma in situ. Acta Cytologica. 45(2):163-8, 2001
  76. Mulvany N. Ostor A. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a cytohistopathologic study of 40 cases. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 16(5):430-6, 1997
  77. Byrne AJ. Endocyte endometrial smears in the cytodiagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Acta Cytologica. 34(3):373-81, 1990
  78. Soofer SB. Sidawy MK. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: clinically significant lesions and means of patient follow-up. Cancer. 90(4):207-14, 2000
  79. Ayer B. Pacey F. Greenberg M. Bousfield L. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. I. Adenocarcinoma in situ. Acta Cytologica. 31(4):397-411, 1987
  80. Laverty CR. Farnsworth A. Thurloe J. Bowditch R. The reliability of a cytological prediction of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 28(4):307-12, 1988
  81. Nasu I. Meurer W. Fu YS. Endocervical glandular atypia and adenocarcinoma: a correlation of cytology and histology. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 12(3):208-18, 1993
  82. Roberts JM. Thurloe JK. Bowditch RC. Laverty CR. Subdividing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance according to the Australian modified Bethesda, system: analysis of outcomes. Cancer. 90(2):87-95, 2000
  83. Wain G.V., Farnsworth A. and Hacker N.V. Cervical carcinoma after negative Pap smears: evidence against rapid-onset cancers. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2: p318-322, 1992
  84. Bousfield L. Pacey F. Young Q. Krumins I. Osborn R. Expanded cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix and related lesions. Acta Cytologica. 24(4):283-96, 1980
  85. van Aspert-van Erp AJ. van 't Hof-Grootenboer AB. Brugal G. Vooijs GP. Endocervical columnar cell intraepithelial neoplasia. I. Discriminating cytomorphologic criteria. Acta Cytologica. 39(6):1199-215, 1995
  86. van Aspert-van Erp AJ. van 't Hof-Grootenboer AB. Brugal G. Vooijs GP. Endocervical columnar cell intraepithelial neoplasia. II. Grades of expression of cytomorphologic criteria. Acta Cytologica. 39(6):1216-32, 1995
  87. Farnsworth A. Laverty C. Stoler MH. Human papillomavirus messenger RNA expression in adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 8(4):321-30, 1989
  88. Tase T. Okagaki T. Clark BA. Twiggs LB. Ostrow RS. Faras AJ. Human papillomavirus DNA in glandular dysplasia and microglandular hyperplasia: presumed precursors of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 73(6):1005-8, 1989
  89. Davey, D.D. Editorial comments re Fiorella op.cit. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 11: 83-84, 1994
  90. Eddy GL. Strumpf KB. Wojtowycz MA. Piraino PS. Mazur MT. Biopsy findings in five hundred thirty-one patients with atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance as defined by the Bethesda system. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 177(5):1188-95, 1997
  91. Leeson SC. Inglis TC. Salman WD. A study to determine the underlying reason for abnormal glandular cytology and the formulation of a management protocol. Cytopathology. 8(1):20-6, 1997
  92. Ronnett BM. Manos MM. Ransley JE. Fetterman BJ. Kinney WK. Hurley LB. Ngai JS. Kurman RJ. Sherman ME. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): cytopathologic features, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus DNA detection. Human Pathology. 30(7):816-25, 1999
  93. Burja IT. Thompson SK. Sawyer WL Jr. Shurbaji MS. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears. A study with cytohistologic correlation. Acta Cytologica. 43(3):351-6, 1999
  94. Hayes MM. Matisic JP. Chen CJ. Mohamed A. Anderson GH. LeRiche JC. Amy R. Cytological aspects of uterine cervical adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma and combined adenocarcinoma-squamous carcinoma: appraisal of diagnostic criteria for in situ versus invasive lesions. Cytopathology. 8(6):397-408, 1997
  95. Denehy TR. Gregori CA. Breen JL. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 90(1):1-6, 1997
  96. Azodi M. Chambers SK. Rutherford TJ. Kohorn EI. Schwartz PE. Chambers JT. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome. Gynaecologic Oncology. 73(3):348-53, 1999
  97. Siziopikou KP. Wang HH. Abu-Jawdeh G. Cytologic features of neoplastic lesions in endocervical glands. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 17(1):1-7, 1997
  98. Krumins I. Young Q. Pacey F. Bousfield L. Mulhearn L. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri. Acta Cytologica. 21(2):320-9, 1977
  99. Alfsen G.C. et al. Cancer. 89: 1291-1299, 2000. Reported in: Incidence of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Subtypes Shifting in Norwegian Women. Reuters Medical News. http://womenshealth.medscape.com/reuters/prof/2000/09/09.25/
    20000922epid004.html
  100. Jaworski RC. Endocervical glandular dysplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and early invasive (microinvasive) adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology. 7(3):190-204, 1990
  101. Clark AH. Betsill WL Jr. Early endocervical glandular neoplasia. II. Morphometric analysis of the cells. Acta Cytologica. 30(2):127-34, 1986
  102. Barter RA. Waters ED. Cyto- and histo-morphology of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Pathology. 2(1):33-40, 1970
  103. Biscotti CV. Hart WR. Apoptotic bodies: a consistent morphologic feature of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 22(4):434-9, 1998
  104. Granter SR. Lee KR. Cytologic findings in minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (adenoma malignum) of the cervix. A report of seven cases. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 105(3):327-33, 1996
  105. Sato S. Ito K. Konno R. Okamoto S. Yajima A. Adenoma malignum. Report of a case with cytologic and colposcopic findings and immunohistochemical staining with antimucin monoclonal antibody HIK-1083. Acta Cytologica. 44(3):389-92, 2000
  106. Ishii K. Katsuyama T. Ota H. Watanabe T. Matsuyama I. Tsuchiya S. Shiozawa T. Toki T. Cytologic and cytochemical features of adenoma malignum of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 87(5):245-53, 1999
  107. Nguyen GK. Jeannot AB. Exfoliative cytology of in situ and microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytologica. 28(4):461-7, 1984
  108. Mulvany NJ. Surtees V. Cervical/vaginal endometriosis with atypia: A cytohistopathologic study. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 21(3):188-93, 1999
  109. Ayer B. Pacey F. Greenberg M. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. II. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytologica. 32(3):318-24, 1988
  110. Boon ME. Baak JP. Kurver PJ. Overdiep SH. Verdonk GW. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: an underdiagnosed lesion. Cancer. 48(3):768-73, 1981
  111. Kudo R. Sagae S. Hayakawa O. Ito E. Horimoto E. Hashimoto M. Morphology of adenocarcinoma in situ and microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A cytologic and ultrastructural study. Acta Cytologica. 35(1):109-16, 1991
  112. Ayer BS. Pacey NF. Greenberg ML. The cytological features of invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix uteri. Cytopathology. 2(4):181-91, 1991
  113. Chang WC. Matisic JP. Zhou C. Thomson T. Clement PB. Hayes MM. Cytologic features of villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison with typical endocervical adenocarcinoma with a villoglandular component and papillary serous carcinoma. Cancer. 87(1):5-11, 1999
  114. Benoit JL. Kini SR. "Arias-00Stella reaction"-like changes in endocervical glandular epithelium in cervical smears during pregnancy and postpartum states-a potential diagnostic pitfall. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 14(4):349-55, 1996
  115. Ruiter DJ. Boon ME. Atypical indifferent (reserve) cells in the cervical epithelium and their exfoliative pattern. Acta Cytologica. 26(3):292-8, 1982
  116. Abdulla M. Hombal S. Kanbour A. Becich M. Stankovich D. Ries A. Kanbour-Shakir A. Characterizing "blue blobs". Immunohistochemical staining and ultrastructural study. Acta Cytologica. 44(4):547-50, 2000
  117. Buckley C.H., Herbert A., Johnson J., Mackenzie E.F.D., Smith J.H.F., Smith P.A., Stanbridge, C.M., Turnbull L.S. and Wadehra V. Borderline nuclear changes in cervical smears: Guidelines on their recognition and management. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 47: 481-492, 1994
  118. Gupta DK. Komaromy-Hiller G. Raab SS. Nath ME. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the cytologic diagnosis of normal and abnormal metaplastic squamous cells in pap smears. Acta Cytologica. 45(5):697-703, 2001
  119. Montes MA. Cibas ES. DiNisco SA. Lee KR. Cytologic characteristics of abnormal cells in prior "normal" cervical/vaginal Papanicolaou smears from women with a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Cancer. 87(2):56-9, 1999
  120. Stoler MH. Does every little cell count? Don't "ASCUS". Cancer. 87(2):45-7, 1999
  121. Quddus MR. Sung CJ. Steinhoff MM. Lauchlan SC. Singer DB. Hutchinson ML. Atypical squamous metaplastic cells: reproducibility, outcome, and diagnostic features on ThinPrep Pap test. Cancer. 93(1):16-22, 2001
  122. Acs G. Gupta PK. Baloch ZW. Glandular and squamous atypia and intraepithelial lesions in atrophic cervicovaginal smears. One institution's experience. Acta Cytologica. 44(4):611-7, 2000
  123. Solomon, D., Frable, W.F., Vooijs, G.P., Wilbur, D.C., Amma, N.S., Davey, D.D., Luff, R.D., Rosenthal, D.L. and Suprun, H.Z. ASCUS and AGUS Criteria: IAC Task Force Summary. Acta Cytologica 42:16-24, 1998
  124. Mosher RE. Lee KR. Trivijitsilp P. Crum CP. Cytologic correlates of papillary immature metaplasia (immature condyloma) of the cervix. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 18(6):416-21, 1998
  125. Atkinson B.F. and Silverman J.F. Atlas of Difficult Diagnoses in Cytopathology. WB Saunders Philadelphia 1998
  126. Vela Velasquez CT. "Atypical parakeratosis" cells in cervical carcinoma cytology. Acta Cytologica. 41(2):614-6, 1997
  127. Johnson SJ. Wadehra V. How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting invasive squamous cell carcinoma? Cytopathology. 12(3):144-50, 2001
  128. Voytek TM. Kannan V. Kline TS. Atypical parakeratosis: a marker of dysplasia? Diagnostic Cytopathology. 15(4):288-91, 1996
  129. Wilbur DC. Maurer S. Smith NJ. Behcet's disease in a vaginal smear. Report of a case with cytologic features and their distinction from squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Cytologica. 37(4):525-30, 1993
  130. Papanicolaou G.N. (1943) Atlas of Exfoliative Cytology. Cambridge, Mass: Commonwealth Fund, Harvard University Press. Cited in: Kline T.S. The Papanicolaou Smear: A Brief Historical Perspective and Where We Are Today. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 121:205-209, 1997
  131. Yeoh GP. Chan KW. Cell block preparation on residual ThinPrep sample. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 21(6):427-31, 1999
  132. Roberts JM. Thurloe JK. Bowditch RC. Humcevic J. Laverty CR. Comparison of ThinPrep and Pap smear in relation to prediction of adenocarcinoma in situ. Acta Cytologica. 43(1):74-80, 1999
  133. Boschann H-W. Cytology and Histology of Effects of Ionizing Radiation on the Female Genital Tract. Tutorials of Cytology Chicago Ill, 1974
Previous Page

 

Home | Table of Contents | Foreword | Introduction | Part I | Part II | Part III | Appendicies | References

Title: Challenges in Cytology
Publication Date: October 2002
ISBN: 1 74080 029X
Published by: NSW Cervical Screening Program, Westmead Hospital NSW 2145

© NSW Cervical Screening Program and R C Bowditch Pty Ltd 2002